The truth behind lightsaber technology

Hey everybody, it is Matt Gluesenkamp again.  With such a big to-do at the research center about the 50th anniversary of the laser’s invention, I started thinking about how many movies out there show lasers being used in fantastical ways. From a bright red beam slowly moving to cut a bound-and-gagged spy in half (mostly possible) to a plane-mounted foot-thick laser popping a houseful of popcorn (not really going to work), there are a lot of myths and legends about lasers that Hollywood has generated or perpetuated over the years.

But perhaps the most well-known instance of “lasers” in cinema are the lightsabers from the Star Wars saga. I put quotes around “lasers” because the way lightsabers behave in these movies is quite a bit different from the way lasers behave in real life. So I wanted to take a look at these fictional devices, how they supposedly work in the Star Wars universe, and compare that to how they might work in our own, real, universe.

Pinning down the canonical inner workings of a lightsaber is tricky, but from browsing through the sometimes contradictory information on StarWars.com, Wookieepedia, and HowStuffWorks.com, I managed to glean what I thought was a pretty good breakdown. In the Star Wars universe, lightsabers are typically custom-built by Jedi and Sith warriors, but all have several common elements. Each has a power source, a lightsaber crystal, one or more focusing crystals, and a stabilizing emitter system. The power source is typically a diatium power cell, often with a capacity of several megawatt-hours. The lightsaber crystal converts the power cell’s energy into a plasma that is then passed through and directed by the focusing crystals. Finally, the emitter system stabilizes the plasma into a blade shape using a mix of power modulation and magnetic field containment.

Did that make sense to anyone? No? Good, then I’m not alone. Science fiction is typically a blend of materials and physical laws that do exist, and those that don’t. Although real-life battery technology is coming along great, we are a long way off from creating handheld batteries with capacities like that the ones found in the lightsaber’s diatium power cell. Perhaps the key lies in discovering this fictional diatium material?

Also, crystals do have many useful optical and piezoelectric properties but I don’t know of one that could magically create plasma from electricity. However, I read that the crystals must be “attuned to the Force” by a Jedi or Sith in a meditation ritual that can take days. So maybe we should start there.

Where the explanations of lightsaber technology get really convoluted is when they start talking about how the blade is shaped and contained. Magnetic fields are currently used to contain plasmas, but they are generated by machinery that must also surround it – Generating such a magnetic envelope from a single, unidirectional source would likely require some new laws of physics. There are also no crystals that can “direct” a plasma.

In fact, a plasma “being directed” by a crystal lens doesn’t make any physical sense anyway. A plasma is really just an ionized gas – a gas in which the electrons have been stripped from their atomic nuclei. We see plasmas all the time. They make up and are emitted from every star, like our solar wind and solar flares. The interaction of the solar wind with Earth’s magnetic field produces the aurora, or northern lights, another form of plasma. Plasmas are also the stuff of every spark and lightning bolt.

Although my specialty isn’t in plasma physics, I can very generally say that plasmas can be created by bringing gases up to a high energy level. The higher the energy, the more atoms will be stripped of their electrons, and the better quality plasma we will have. It’s completely possible that one could create a plasma by producing a large enough voltage difference, a la lightning, or a powerful enough laser focus. However, enormous amounts of energy are required with either of these approaches, and it would be extremely difficult to control the plasma’s shape. An electrical arc can have wild shifts in direction, and it can hardly be controlled without being surrounded by magnets. A laser will go in a straight line, but of course it doesn’t stop. A laser-based lightsaber would require a block or a couple of mirrors floating in midair, moving in sync with the hilt – which is of course largely impossible. On top of that, they would certainly melt in the presence of such a plasma anyway. Further, all of this is saying nothing about what the actual quality of the plasma would be and how reliably or quickly it would cut through objects.

So it seems quite impossible to create a lightsaber, as seen in the Star Wars films, using existing technologies, materials, and physical laws. But given the enthusiasm of Star Wars superfans out there, I wouldn’t be surprised if people are trying. Anyway, since I’m more of a nerd than a plasma physicist, I’ll pose this question to my colleagues: How do you think a real-life lightsaber could work?

Comments

I find your lack of faith disturbing. The ability to shape a plasma field is insignificant next to the power of the force, and not believing is why you fail to be able to describe how it works.

Let’s ignore the obvious disconnect that a lightsaber is not a laser. A better example to explore would be a blaster, which some report would be better to have at your side than hokie religions and ancient weapons, or the Death Star laser, which blew up an entire planet.

Let’s take a moment for the Organas.

But ok, let’s talk about lightsabers.

As in the comic about “then a miracle occurs” (http://avionod.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/then-a-miracle-happens.gif?w=300&h=364), there is a step to making a lightsaber that we in this galaxy do not yet know how to do, and that’s using the force to bind the materials together and also to bind the lightsaber to the force-wielder (jedi or sith).

A force-wielder can control materials mentally, and considering that little Yoda could lift that entire X-Wing from the Dagobah swamp without breaking a sweat (although he did release a few grunts), there’s reason to think that the force-wielder is helping control the blade(s) of the lightsaber.

Just as a biologist has trouble understanding a radio (http://protein.bio.msu.ru/biokhimiya/contents/v69/pdf/bcm_1403.pdf – a must read for any scientist), it’s impossible for us to understand the making of a lightsaber by studying the parts. It would be like trying to understand how a bunch of meat could imagine the Sistine Chapel (or an entire galaxy, far far away) rather than marveling at a brain in its entirety and believing that there are some things we don’t yet understand, but which still work.

If you assume a galaxy with the force and people who can both control and be guided by it, then the possibility of a real lightsaber is a small step from there. So clearly what George Lucas told us about lightsabers was true, from a certain point of view.

Search your feelings, you know it to be true.

via @NickFahrenkopf on Twitter:

Hey @edisonsdesk – here’s your lightsaber! RT @gizmodo Skin-Melting Spyder III Pro Arctic Laser Is Real Life Lightsaber http://bit.ly/bdqbUi

I agree that’s it’s basically impossible for the reasons you state, at least with any known technology. If I were trying to build something like that and had immense hand power available, I would probably build a powerful hand electron LINAC. The electrons would make a nice directed plasma coming out the end and I could control the plasma length by controlling the electron energy (i.e., electron penetration depth in air) and the total power by the electron density and electron energy. I could do this with other charged particles, too. Of course, the weapon’s destructive effects would continue beyond the lighted end (i.e., the end where the electrons no longer have enough energy to ionize air, if that occured before they grounded, which is unlikely), since the electrical circuit must complete somewhere, presumably to ground. This would look more like a “lightning saber”, with the usual environmental effects on beam path as the beam weakens.

Jesse – I see that the Force is strong with you. I did read that the Force-wielder usually (or must) perform the final lightsaber assembly using Force telekinesis, but I read nothing about the blade being actively shaped by the Jedi during use. The three sites I referenced all used scientific-sounding but ultimately largely nonsensical descriptions of how the blade is contained by fields emanating from the hilt. All also mentioned the blade arcing back on itself somehow, but never described just how. If you have a reference to the canonical source that talks about the Force-wielder actively controlling the blade, I’d love to see it, or one that describes the containment field in a bit more detail. Thanks!

[...] folks, make sure you have some tissues handy because GE engineer Matt Gluesenkamp is about to break a lot of hearts. The laser just turned 50, and that got Gluesenkamp thinking [...]

[...] 11, 2010 in Uncategorized | Subscribe Okay, folks, make sure you have some tissues handy because GE engineer Matt Gluesenkamp is about to break a lot of hearts. The laser just turned 50, and that got Gluesenkamp thinking [...]

Also, I mentioned contradictory explanations. The sites I looked at referred to the blade variously as a generic “energy beam,” an “arc wave,” or as a plasma. The first one could mean many things and the second sounds like a science-y term someone made up, so the third was the approach that I analyzed. However, if I knew what kind of “energy beam” they are talking about or what an “arc wave” is, I could think on those explanations as well. This is another reason it would be great to know exactly what the single canonical explanation is. Then again, while I’d call myself knowledgeable in these fields, I’m far from an expert – this is all just in good fun :)

Smoke and Mirrors. Everyone knows its always smoke and mirrors.

Han Solo used Luke´s saber to open the taun taun’s belly, He didnt use the force to control the shape of the blade (He really wasnt a force wise dude)

I actually heard a different explanation for the lightsaber, described to me by someone with a much greater grasp of physics than I have as a possible “real life” way to make one. (That doesn’t take much, honestly.) I’m not saying it’s a good explanation… in fact, it sounded like a pretty bad one to me. But it’s an alternative, I suppose.

The gist of it is that the light saber is, in fact, a laser, reflecting back on itself infinitely due to an indestructible monofilament line extending from the handle and microscopic mirror (also of some indestructible material) at the end of the monofilament. The laser would be of strength that the mass of the photons pushing up against the microscopic mirror would push it away from the handle. The microscopic monofilament would be attached to the mirror, creating a finite length for the very focused laser beam, which would infinitely reflect back and forth from the mirror to a series of mirrors in the handle, and back again. This would create the illusion of a blade. Again… I accept that photons have mass… but this entire explanation seemed kind of hinky to me.

Then again… no laser I can think of explains being able to deflect shots from a blaster. Or, for that matter, why the “blade” of the light saber seems to be solid enough to push/block against another lightsaber, swung at full force…

“The weapon consisted of a blade of pure plasma[1] energy emitted from the hilt and suspended in a force containment field. The field contained the immense heat of the plasma, protecting the wielder, and allowed the blade to keep its shape”

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Lightsaber

The descriptions on wookipedia make it sound like the key is the plasma containment field (think of the field as a sausage skin that is stuffed full of plasma-y goodness). It keeps plasma in/out while allowing fleshy things to pass right through…

I humbly submit for your consideration my counter-point. First let me say that I enjoy a spirited debate about plasma physics as much as the next nerd, but I have a few qualms with your argument. While there is certainly no argument here about the impossibility of halting a laser mid-stream given today’s understanding of wave/particle duality, the vast majority of your points about plasma generally follow the format of “it would take something much more powerful than anything that exists today”…

Plasma can indeed be controlled by magnets, and though today’s plasma fields require magnets completely encasing them for the most part, the only true requirement to contain a plasma field is a strong-enough magnetic field, not a magnet enclosure. One could conceive of a future emitter that is not unipolar, and permits a shaped magnetic field. 50 years ago we knew very little about controlling plasma, and today we already have sustained fusion reactions (albeit ever-so-brief). As for powering the device, I totally agree that it would require a massive amount of energy. But I would assert that simply requiring a massive amount of energy is not an argument that it can’t be done. Again I’ll cite history, this time the history of batteries. We are already on the verge of cell-phones powered by fuel cells, and there have been thousands of advancements in battery technology in the past 50 years alone. Containing an electrical arc is simply a matter of having a powerful enough magnetic field controlled in a very particular manner. This is all impossible today, but not because of physics. It would probably be more reasonable to picture a “plasma saber” that resembles a controlled flame than a perfectly-straight line, but it is none-the-less theoretically possible.

Finally, I’d like to assert a possible concept for a light saber actually based on lasers. While you’re correct that it would probably require some sort of mirror reflecting apparatus suspended properly at the exact distance (we’ll ignore how that would be done for sake of nerd debating), it wouldn’t necessarily be melted by plasma. Fully reflective mirrors reflect nearly all of the energy of any type, we just simply have weak mirrors. Liquid mercury mirrors are more completely reflective than common plated mirrors, and there are manufacturing techniques to improve reflectivity. We don’t have the technology yet, but it isn’t physically impossible, at least not according to my understanding of physics. Anyway, I love your article, and I love a spirited debate. I’m sure I’m probably screwing up a few key concepts here, but I just felt compelled to chime in with my unsolicited opinion. Thanks for the topic to debate, but I’m not ready to let my dreams be crushed just yet!

[...] folks, make sure you have some tissues handy because GE engineer Matt Gluesenkamp is about to break a lot of hearts. The laser just turned 50, and that got Gluesenkamp thinking [...]

I think that the way that this article takes a pragmatic approach to analyzing the components of a light saber, then saying blithe statements without reasoning such as “…[high resolution motion control of floating objects] is of course largely impossible” shows a lack of imagination, and perhaps a lack of drive to bring new and interesting technologies to market. As an engineer, I hope not all GE engineers show the same “yawn” disdain for pushing the horizons of what is possible.

Happy laser day.

I would have gone with superpositional Photon Holography…on account of String Theory giving you the answer A/0=NOT A.

[...] that, Matt Gluesenkamp! I look forward to your next project, The Impossibility of Warp Factor 10. [GE via Dvice] [...]

Ouch… You just tried to damage a big part of my childhood.

Y’kno, its biggits like you that hinder true technological progress.

As a man of science, you shouldn’t be celebrating the 50th year anniversary of the laser by trying to disprove something. You should be doing the opposite and trying to prove that its possible- to at least inspire hope and creativity in younger people.

[...] folks, make sure you have some tissues handy, because GE engineer Matt Gluesenkamp is about to break a lot of hearts. The laser just turned 50, and that got Gluesenkamp thinking [...]

I have to agree, at least partially, with James Kelley. Don’t give up the dream, think of all the other things that were claimed impossible before someone invented them. More likely we and the technology just aren’t advanced enough yet. But I’m sure I’m just preaching to the choir and all us nerds already realize this. Good-day.

I always thought a real lightsaber would have a fixed blade; a “plasma” could be generated on the surface of the blade, giving it its amazing cutting power. The only difference with the StarWars lightsaber is that when you turn it off, you have a 4 foot long metal stick, not a tidy little handle.

I am going to pose this question to my 8 year old grandson who seems to know everything (keep in mind is only 8 so maybe not EVERYTHING) about Star Wars..

Thanks to everybody for participating in the discussion and leaving your comments! Just to clarify… have no fear that GE researchers are losing their imagination. To Jose and the others out there who have called us out on a great point– pretty much every great invention or discovery was at one point deemed to be “impossible”.

Matt’s entry was only one in a series on the 50th anniversary, which to us was a celebration of this sentiment exactly. Something that only 50 years ago didn’t exist is now such an integral part of every day life and of our favorite scifi classics. With the incredible minds and imaginations in the world and those yet to enter the world– who knows what we will see 50 years to come.

Keep commenting! And Kathleen– let us know what your grandson has to say :)

I’m not scientist but what if we fire stream of short living particles, with energy and speed adjusted in such way that they brake down into photons after reaching specific distance from emiter, or after hitting air particle ? I would not be literally laser sword, but visual effect would be the same I think

[...] Matt Gluesenkamp! Espero pelo seu próximo projeto, A Impossibilidade de um Warp Factor 10. [GE via DVICE] Categoria:  [...]

OK, I shall put up my light sabre and use it no more. Nice to see you in print. If we can’t have light sabres then go out and find the next cool application.

People always get hung up on terminating the laser but the simple answer is that the laser isn’t running except when cutting. Think about the power required for cutting as depicted it would be immense. If you left that running then you’d have a megawatt heater running in the room and cook everyone in no time at all. Logicaly one would have a detection field and activate the laser only when something passed through it massively reducing the energy consumption of the device. So we can assume that since the laser is only used for cutting it is terminated by whatever it is cutting.

The trademark glowing stick would then simply be an indication of the danger zone as required by the Jedi HSE. This could be achieved as easily as holding an inert gas plasma in a magnetic field as a kind of glassless neon bulb.

As for our containment field and “it can hardly be controlled without being surrounded by magnets” that is a ridiculous thing to say. Controling plasma by shaped electro magnetic fields is current technology and whilst focusing technologies perhaps arent that advanced yet the control is no more of a leap between the 2 dimensional graphics of pong and the 3 dimensional physics of a modern game. It’s the hardware that is lacking.

Now as you all remember from school an electromagnetic field comes from a coiled bit of copper with some volts pumped through but we are talking rusty sword there compared to surgeons scalpel we need. To achieve the sort of focus we would require for our glassless neon bulb would need something else and the solution would likely come from buckminsterfullerenes (tubes made from carbon atoms which make copper wire look like a 6 foot concrete sewer pipe) which could easily fall into the definition of a crystal as “A homogenous solid formed by a repeating, three-dimensional pattern of atoms” (www.thefreedictionary.com/crystal) and crystal is a bit less of a mouthful ;-)

Now procrastination over and back to my engineering degree essay, I’ll knock up a protoype during my exam prep :-P

I like Larry Niven’s variable sword, (Ringworld). Perhaps not as pretty, and it won’t melt through a blast door like Qui-Gon’s, but hey: It’s at least *perhaps* doable.

And it won’t require a power cell that will blast a hole in the planetary crust if damaged.

MFs comment about being left with a 4 foot metal rod… I think this solves one problem… why not make it collapseable!! like a car ariel… We know that is exsisting technology that works and it would fit into the handle… although atm we would need an external powersource and it probably wouldnt be safe to hold it!

maybe one day the scientist could make a sword like thing that have a blade like the one from the time when knights fightet with primetive swords made of iron. the the diference is just that the surface is covered in a hot laser like thing

when it comes to lightsabers its important to remember that the force serves as way to manpulate energy on a quantum levle,matter is only a way for energy to exist in reality/the universe.the fisrt crystal tells the energy to behave differantly than it is suposed to according to the laws of physics.the focusing crystal condenses and compreses the field that holds the heat and unique “lightsaber” energy. both the control field and distructive energy works togather,along with the stablelizing emitter matrix, to achieve the shape.the electrical energy is used for the control feild and to stimulate the first crystal to on a quantum levle, rearange the electrons into photons,againe with differant more exotic properties and behaviors. another possabilty is that a microscopic opening in the faberick of spacetime allows for tachionic energy tobe utilized

you just shitted all over my hopes and dreams. for that i say fuck you guy. however this last person here seems to have toppled your theories with qauntum physical shit. n000000000000000000000000000b

In my limited understanding of physics, it is beyond me how to create a light saber, although I did have an interesting thought or two on the matter.
Some elements and other energy phenomena have extremely short half-lifes or lifespans, and if they can be fairly accurately measured as time it could negate the need for a device to intercept the beam of energy or light after it exits the hilt of the light saber. If this source of energy were to be shot out of the hilt of the light saber, but say only has a life expectancy of mere milliseconds, the need for a mechanism to stop the projection of energy could be unnecessary. With an extremely short life expectancy, it could be feasible that the, “light-saber’s” discharge could be timed in such a way that the actual cutting length would be only a meter or so long before it were to dissipate and become harmless. (Or not, via residual harmful effects from the discharge)
Containing such a source of great cutting/burning power in a solid and predictable pattern can take a cue from the toy light sabers that are produced today. If when the light saber is activated, an extremely powerful, yet thin, magnet telescopically protrudes from the hilt, this could then control the width and length of the beam. Perhaps the magnetic field required to control the plasma can be on the inside of the beam, not necessarily being contained by surrounding magnets, but rather from the field created by the guide rod.
Perhaps this can spark new ways of thinking about the creation of light saber. In the comments section these ideas were submitted, but I believe that the important question to answer is the substance of the beam and how it can be harnessed into a short controlled form, not the energy requirements needed to power it. Those problems can be addressed as the saber takes form, but a general starting point for the actual beam needs to take shape before this project can begin.

To construct a lightsaber, install an arc reactor as seen in Iron Man in the hilt for the eternal power source. Then put a positive magnet at the top of the hilt. hold a negative magnet 2 and a half feet away from that so that there is enough charge to keep the magnet close but not completely repel it away. Get an electrician to spark the space in between the two magnets with electricity to get a continuous amount of lightning to flow between the two magnets, powered by the arc reactor. although its more lightning than laser, it will still cut through humans like buttter hopefully. now all we need is tony stark to look at this comment and arm his suit with this amazing weapon in Iron Man 3 and/or The Avengers 2.

All I have to say is “NANO TECHNOLOGY”! Small and can generate a ton of consistant energry. Look up the video about the guy who gave an extraordinary version of how to build a light saber using this tech.

Leave a comment
Name*
Email* (We will never share your email address)
Comment

join the conversation


editors

Meet the researchers

Meet talented scientists from GE's Global Research centers around the world